Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Expected usability is not a valid indicator of experienced usability
Usability is a core construct of website evaluation and inherently defined as interactive. Yet, when analysing first impressions of websites, expected usability, i.e., before use, is of interest. Here we investigate to what extend ratings of expected usability are related to (a) experienced usability, i.e., ratings after use, and (b) objective usability measures, i.e., task performance. Further...
متن کاملValidation and reliability study of a ventilator usability assessment tool
Abstract Background: Usability is an index to assess a product from the viewpoint of users satisfaction, efficiency and productivity improvement. The main attributes of usability that are derived from the human factors are and used in usability design of the interfaces Include: compatibility, consistency, flexibility, minimal action, perceptual limitation, usefulness, learnability, ease of u...
متن کاملTo Measure or not to measure: Why web usability is different from traditional usability
Web usability is a common term used in discussions of WWW (World Wide Web). This is definitely important, as more and more web sites are frequently visited and have great impact in the new economy, the network economy. However, research lack in consistency in defining ‘web usability’. Some point out that the term is equivalent with the traditional term in HCI (Human Computer Interaction) resear...
متن کاملIs Usability Getting Unpopular?
This paper reports the first results from a recent study done on user involvement in Icelandic software industry. A questionnaire survey was made to gather information on the software processes used and to what extent user involvement methods are used by software developers in the different processes. The results show that the majority of the respondents use their own process where they have ad...
متن کاملUsability is Quality of Use
In a paper at HCI International 1991, Bevan et al (1991) asked “What is usability?”, and distinguished between broad and narrow approaches to usability. This paper builds on that distinction, identifying the broad approach to usability with the higher level quality objective of “quality of use” (Bevan, 1995a). Quality of use should be the major design objective for an interactive product: does ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: PeerJ Computer Science
سال: 2015
ISSN: 2376-5992
DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.19